Invasive SpeciesMultiflora rose

Rosa multiflora
NOT FOUND by sniffly salamander
2011-11-05
Belgrade
ID Confirmed
Quality checked by manyeyes
Peer reviewed by vitalsleuth
Field Notes
We are a group of citizen scientists made up of college students, educators, and watershed conservationists. We are doing Vital Signs in Belgrade. Here is what we are all happy about, what we see, hear, and smell, and here are the questions that we have. We see hooded merganzers. It's a crisp fall day. We are excited to look for species. I hear cars and the crunch of freshly fallen leaves. We saw docks that need to go in next summer. Woody aroma. We saw leaves still on trees. We're outside in the sun and fresh air. Where actually is a good place to look for these species. What makes them invasive? We saw black walnuts. We are happy outside. We are happy because the shoreline is beautiful over there. I hear water. I see a waterfall. I feel cold. (for the record, these photos were taken by sniffly salamander's trusty assistant, and not by the sniffly herself!)
Supporting Evidence
Photo of my evidence.
Our first piece of evidence that we did NOT find multiflora rose is that the berries of this plant were larger than the pea-sized hips of multiflora rose. These berries are more soft and juicy and you can see the seeds inside when you hold them in a sunbeam. Multiflora rose hips are harder and more dense.
Photo of my evidence.
The second piece of evidence that we did NOT find multiflora rose is that the leaves of this species are simple, not compound like multiflora rose. The leaf edges are smooth, not toothed like the rose. Further, very convincing (!) evidence is that there are no thorns. We missed getting a stem photo, so you'll have to take our word for it.
Photo of my evidence.
We think we may have found deadly nightshade. Do you agree? This leaf had lots of evidence of herbivory. We wonder what's eating it, and whether this predator will keep this invasive species in check...or not!
Species Observation: Species Looked For
Did you find it?: 
I think I did not find it
Scientific name:
Rosa multiflora
Common name:
Multiflora rose
Count of individuals: 
Coverage: 
Reproduction: 
Sampling method: 
Quadrat (user-placement)
Photo of our sampling method.
Place Studied
We\’re sorry, Javascript is required to view the map. You may wish to upgrade to a newer browser in order to view this Google Map.
Map this species
Latitude: 
N 44.528020 °
Longitude: 
W -69.887000 °
Observation Site Information
A photo of our study site.
Name:
sniffly salamander's visit to MLRC
Habitat: 
Coastal - Beach or dune
Trip Information
Name:
MLRC
Trip date: 
Sat, 2011-11-05 13:10
Town or city: 
Belgrade
Type of investigation: 
Species and Habitat Survey
Ecosystem: 
Upland
Watershed: 
Lower Kennebec
Sampling Method: 
Quadrat (user-placement)
Nearest waterbody: 
Great Pond
Habitat Observations
Species diversity: 
9 different species
Evidence of vectors: 
Walking trail
People
Recent disturbance
Tree canopy cover: 
Between 1/4 and 1/2
Soil moisture: 
Moist

Comments

Hi Sniffly,

Good job! You're correct that this plant is not multiflora rose. You used good plant identification skills, and determined that what you found in the field did not match the information on the multiflora rose information sheet. And, you looked at more than just one characteristic of the plant, always a good idea.

I agree that the plant you found is a nightshade, but I think it's probably bittersweet nightshade, Solanum dulcamara, rather than deadly nightshade.

By the way, your trust assistant is to be commended for posting great photos!