Dasysiphonia japonicaNOT FOUND by srichman
Quality checked by SRichman
Peer reviewed by Marine Biology Class
Today, May 19, 2015, I went to Spring Point Marina early in the morning to get some plankton samples. As I walked along the docks, I noticed a lot of filamentous red seaweed growing on the cement walls. I often find filamentous reds attached to the underside of the docks, but this species seemed to be really abundant. I was concerned that it might be the invasive species, Heterosiphonia japonica, now called Dasysiphonia japonica, taking over the area. I collected a sample for us to examine under the microscope at school. Everyone in the class examined this seaweed, but there was disagreement about its identity. Ten out of sixteen people combined their observations for this entry.
We know the red seaweed is not Heterosiphonia japonica because the branches of the seaweed we examined are multiple cells thick, while H. Japonica has side, or smaller, branches that are one cell thick. Therefore these are two different species of red algae. In most of our samples, all branches are the same thickness or appear to be. Using more scientific terms, in Heterosiphonia, the main branch is polysiphonous, and the smaller side branches are monosiphonous.
Our seaweed has sections of rounded cells, or little bulbs, inside the branches. This is something not found in the rectangular cells of H. Japonica. The seaweed in question is not H. Japonica. These might be reproductive structures
Heterosiphonia growth is axial, not dichotomous. Our specimen grew dichotomously, or split into twos. Because of the two different growth patterns, they cannot be the same species. Plus, there aren’t irregular side branches that appear “hair like” and narrowing like those of Heterosiphonia. The side branches of our seaweed appear thick
N 43.649568 °
W -70.230900 °
Spring Point Marina
Tue, 2015-05-19 06:35
Town or city:
Type of investigation:
Time of low tide:
Tue, 2015-05-19 06:36